» Font Size «
Apr
29

Can I Withdraw My Plea?

From time to time I receive a call from an individual seeking to withdraw their previously entered plea of guilty or no contest. Unfortunately, Ohio law is extremely restrictive when it comes to the right of an individual to withdraw their plea after sentencing.  A recent Ninth Appellate District case illustrates the restrictive nature of such a request.

The case, State v. Simone, 2010 Ohio 1824, involved a multiple DUI offender who plead guilty and was sentenced to nine months in prison (his fourth conviction of DUI in five years).  The defendant served his six months and ten years later filed a motion to withdraw his plea.  The basis of the motion was the defendant’s claim that one of his prior pleas was uncounseled.
In its opinion, the court cited Crim R 32.1 that states:
“A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest may be made only before sentence is imposed; but to correct manifest injustice the court after sentence may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his or her plea.”
The court went on to say:
“It is the defendant’s burden to prove that a manifest injustice exists. State v. Smith (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 261, 264, 361 N.E.2d 1324. The trial court should grant the motion only in extraordinary cases. Id. A trial court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to withdraw a guilty plea will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. State v. Brown, 9th Dist. No. 23455, 2007 Ohio 2885, at P9,  [**9] quoting State v. Atkinson, 9th Dist. No. 05CA0079-M, 2006 Ohio 5806, at P10, citing Smith, 49 Ohio St.2d at 264. An abuse of discretion “implies that the court’s attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable.” Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219, 5 Ohio B. 481, 450 N.E.2d 1140.”
The court then defined “abuse of discretion” as follows:
“A trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to withdraw a plea where three elements are met. First, the defendant must have been represented by competent counsel; second the court must provide the defendant a full hearing prior to accepting the original guilty plea; and, finally, the court must provide a full hearing to the defendant, considering all the arguments in favor of withdrawal of his plea, before rendering a decision on the motion.” (Internal citations and quotations omitted). Brown at P10.”
So, if we summarize the court’s opinion, the following is obvious:
1.  A motion to withdraw a plea must be filed prior to sentencing in nearly all cases.
2.  The court will only entertain such a motion AFTER sentencing to cure some manifest injustice.
3.  It is the defendant’s burden to prove the existence of the injustice.
4.  The motion will granted only in extraordinary circumstances (which means rarely).
5.  A lower court’s failure to grant such a motion will only be overturned if the court abused its discretion.
6.  Abuse of discretion will not be granted when:
a.  The defendant was represented by a competent attorney.
b.  A full hearing was had prior to the court’s acceptance of the defendant’s original plea.
c.  The court provided a full hearing on the defendant’s motion.
As one can see, the burden on the defendant is great.  Not only must the defendant present overwhelming evidence of some patent injustice, but a higher court will not reverse or remand a lower court’s decision absent some showing of the lower court’s abuse of discretion – a very high standard indeed.
The lesson to be learned is be sure you have a full understanding of the consequences of your plea.  Be sure you retain competent counsel who is fully versed on the law and the possible sentences that could result from your plea.  If there is any issue regarding your plea, be sure your attorney enters an exception on the record.  Finally, don’t sit on your rights.  Timely filing is always an issue.

Commnets

  1. Great post!

  2. Thanks for writing. I worked a lot of work

  3. This is a very useful information!

Leave a Comment